Moon potential goldmine of natural resources
Updated 4 months ago

As the Earth’s natural resources gradually dwindle, some scientists believe the moon could prove a goldmine for future generations.
Forty years after American Neil Armstrong first walked on the moon, and as the United States prepares to return astronauts to Earth’s nearest neighbor by 2020, it remains an object of fascination and curiosity.
Part of the goal of once again returning to our only satellite, and establishing bases there, is to learn more about its hidden natural resources.
“The moon still has a great deal of scientific information left to be discovered that relates directly to… our understanding of the history of the Earth and early history of other planets,” geologist Harrison Schmitt told AFP.
Schmitt landed on the moon in 1972 aboard the Apollo 17, the last manned mission to ever touch down on the lunar surface. He is among an elite group of 12 Americans who are the only people to have walked on the moon.
Among the 382 kilos (842 pounds) of rocks and lunar soil brought back by astronauts from the moon during six Apollo missions is a rock that scientists call “genesis,” which dates back to around 4.5 million years ago, about the time when the solar system began.
The moon, which has virtually no atmosphere, is effectively a geological blank slate for scientists because it has not had the contact with water and air that has changed the Earth’s surface.
“One reason to go back to the moon is to find out whether there is anything of value to be done there… If the answer is yes, you can do economically valuable things and use local resources,” said John Logsdon, a curator at Washington’s National Air and Space Museum.
America’s new lunar program, dubbed Constellation, was launched in 2004 with the intention of establishing a forward operating station for astronauts as well as to seek evidence of water beneath the moon’s ground ice.
President Barack Obama has appointed a commission to review the program’s cost and goals, but the launch last month of two preparatory lunar modules suggests it is likely to proceed in some form.
Several other countries, including China and Russia, have announced their ambitions to send missions to the moon, which is 384,400 kilometers (238,855 miles) from Earth — about a four-day trip by space shuttle.
“I think you will see at least Antarctic-like scientific outposts and maybe even larger facilities on the moon, with people spending long durations of time there,” Logsdon told AFP.
Schmitt, a former astronaut, noted that the moon’s soil is rich in helium-3, which comes from the outer layer of the sun and is blown around the solar system by solar winds.
The element is rarely found on Earth, unlike on the moon, where it is heavily accumulated because it is pushed away by the Earth’s magnetic poles.
Helium-3 is highly sought for nuclear fusion, and though the technology is still in its infancy, the element “will ultimately be quite valuable on Earth,” Schmitt said.
“It’s not the only solution to the accelerating demand for energy that we are going to see on Earth, but it’s certainly one of the major potential solutions to that demand.”
Reserves of helium-3 on the moon are in the order of a million tons, according to some estimates, and just 25 tons could serve to power the European Union and United States for a year.
The moon is also an ideal location for astronauts to prepare and train for long missions into space, including to Mars, according to NASA.
“Lunar exploration will allow us to test technologies, systems, flight operation and exploration techniques that will reduce the risk and cost of potential future human missions to asteroids, Mars and beyond,” the US space agency said.
26 comments



is there anything some people won’t do for money?
Many nations are scrambling to figure out how to harvest the moons resources. We probably do need to catch up to the Chinese.
Problem is, doesn’t it seem weird to haul a bunch of raw material to earth from the moon? I mean, what will be the residual side effects on our planet?
“which dates back to around 4.5 million years ago, about the time when the solar system began.”
I think that should be 4.5 billion years…
Be fruitful and multiply, ruin the Earth, then start doing the same to the moon. The only solution to human problems is fewer people. World human population over 1 billion is just cancer.
“…which dates back to around 4.5 million years ago, about the time when the solar system began.”
Make that “billion.”
“The element is rarely found on Earth…”
That should be “isotope,” not “element.”
So, here’s another resource for our wars not to be about.
4.5 million years ago? start of the solar system? I thought the planet was billions, not millions, of years old….
we can support the 8 billion we’ll have in a decade.. we just need to get smarter and want less junk.
we should also be slowing down growth rates, not speeding them up.. but that requires education and decent human beings that understand their impact on the planet, and _care_.
humans are a cancer no matter their numbers.. but we don’t have to be malignant
Apparently somebody from NASA went to the movies last weekend. That’s the plot of the sci-fi film “Moon.” Which, BTW does not make a good case for sending humans to the Moon!
Isn’t it enough that we’ve already raped the earth for everything it’s got? Now we have to go after the moon, too? I’m glad I’ll (hopefully) be dead before all of this comes to fruition because the direction humanity has taken makes me sick….
So, as we harvest resouces from the moon, we will lesson the moon’s mass, which will, among other things, reduce the oceans’ tides, which so much life depends on. I’d call it what it is, stupid, shortsighted, and too costly to pursue in reality.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
Moonrocks range in age from about 3.16 billion to about 4.5 billion years old.
[...] the NASA PR people went to the movies too. Today we learn that geologist Harrison Schmitt (who landed on the moon in 1972 aboard the Apollo 17) is excited about th… Schmitt, a former astronaut, noted that the moon’s soil is rich in helium-3, which comes from the [...]
Million, Billion, as an American, who really cares? I have an egg McMuffin that’s as old as that.
“So, as we harvest resouces from the moon, we will lesson the moon’s mass, which will, among other things, reduce the oceans’ tides, which so much life depends on. I’d call it what it is, stupid, shortsighted, and too costly to pursue in reality.” - Rick, the moon is huge. 7.3477 x 1022^22 kg, and securing a second foothold for human life in our solar system is key to our survival, as well as a much better way to spend our money and time than on war and being greedy and stupid. Also, both the Moon and Earth gain quite a bit of weight each year from crap floating around in space, I don’t think it’d be an issue.
satan, I disagree that we need to secure another foothold.. what we need to do is learn how to stop fucking up this one.
The point is, if we “mine” the moon and bring that material to earth, we will be shifting the masses over time, and that could end up causing problems.
They never thought we’d run out of land or food or water or oil, either.
We have not even scratched the surface of the value here on earth yet, so we should not forget that principle of Ecocosmology as we look around us.
As an economist, this is pure twaddle, as the cost of access and extraction are “to the moon” in energy alone. Justifications for space exploration are many, some of them very wothwhile. This is not one of them…..
Ship all neocons to the moon. It would solve two problems: 1) no neocons on earth, and 2) no neocons within hearing distance from earth (note: don’t give them any transmitting radios).
“Problem is, doesn’t it seem weird to haul a bunch of raw material to earth from the moon? ”
NO it just seems stupid. See the post by the person above who said “As an economist, this is pure twaddle, as the cost of access and extraction are “to the moon” in energy alone. Justifications for space exploration are many, some of them very wothwhile. This is not one of them…..”
You hit the nail on the head. There is NOTHING in the way of elements that would be worth the energy to get to the moon and bring it back. The only thing we can bring back is knowlage, or sample rocks that expand our knowlage. But knowlage that is not useful is not worth anything. Knowing that the moon is not made of chease has not helped anything here on earth.
It’s highly unlikely that there is an economically viable way of exploiting the moon. But if that’s what we have to tell people to get the funding for space exploration, I’m all for it.
The incredible levels of ignorance in the fields of science and economics has me wondering if rawstory is excessively attractive to the short bus crowd… First of all, both the earth AND moon gain several TONS annually in space debris, Some of those speck of dust you see floating around? About 5% of them are of extra-terrestrial origin!! Rocks and dust are constantly bombarding both the earth and moon, sometimes it is spectacular, most of the time nobody would notice, even the spectacular ones(can you guess why? Hint: it has to do with our massive ocean coverage.). As far as helium-3: Whoever can start harvesting the stuff will be the worlds next Saudi Arabia of CLEAN NONPOLLUTING ENERGY!!!! That’s right kiddos!! Fusion with helium 3 is clean and non waste generating!!! It is one of the lower temperature methods of fusion physics has to offer for now. We are an exploitative and expansionist species, that I will not deny, NOR WILL I EVER APOLOGIZE FOR THOSE FACTS!! If you don’t like it, then just get yourselves out of the way. You fools are as bad as the church inquisitors of dark times past, you wish to shun knowledge for everybody in a desperate ploy to maintain your limited and stunted world view. Your tools for doing so are the same as the inquisitors, fear and foolish lies to support those fears. If you want to live in darkness, then by all means, stay in the dark. But stay the hell out of my way and the way of others trying to illuminate the body of human knowledge who are guided by the spirit of exploration. The posting of many of your opinions here show how failed the public school system really is. Other that Satan and Scott from Canada, the rest of you need to put on your helmets to protect your soft spots and get back on the short bus.
Apparently the article writer is a devote of the Bishop of Usher, who tried to give man’s life span by working back from the bible. I guess we still have Christian pseduo-scientists who write false science. Hominds are 4.5 million years old, and that is where we came from through evolving human species. But today, I think that evolution has stopped with some of these morons!!!
The population of the USA will be over a billion by 2100, and the world population may be 35-50 billion. The resources that people will be scrambling for will be edible biomass and water. All other concerns will be forgotten. We can strive to return to the moon, but in several decades what will it matter? Our children’s children will be little better off than a Bengali slum dweller is now. Probably worse off.
rmwarnick I mean to see that movie MOON online this weekend, it seems to be a pretty good movie. Also for everybody there is a program coming on NGEO (National Geographci channel) about maintaining and using the moon for resources this sunday at 8 I believe, great graphics also. The US and the rest of the world should put the scientists into developing a better rocket engine that doesn’t need rocket fuel or uses intertia to operate. They do have Ion engines, but there thrust ratio is a like a piece of school paper lying on your hand. Doesn’t have the short thrust.
The Moon has tremendous value outside of raw materials for consumerism. It can be a huge source of solar energy. It can be a gateway for space launches beyond the Earth-moon system using electromagnetic launchers and ion drives instead of chemical rockets. It can help humankind get its proverbial eggs out of the single basket of Earth’s biosphere. It can offer space for agriculture. At some point, it gets bigger than just materials for cheap goods - it gets to be about survival and even expansion of the species. If you wait until you solve every socio-political problem before beginning to colonize the solar system, you’ll doom the entire planet’s biology to likely extinction in some kind of catastrophic event. Possibly even caused by our own ignorance. The Moon is the logical place to go next, to build the spaceport that will REALLY open up the rest of space for us all.
Energy spent over energy recovered. Think people, think! I know you can do it.